
Have you been injured from a dog bite or attack?
Experiencing a dog growling and lunging towards you or your child can be a traumatic experience, regardless of whether you love dogs or have pets of your own. In Texas, there are specific laws that hold dog owners responsible for the pain, suffering, and medical bills resulting from dog bites. However, Texas follows the "one free bite" rule, which means that dog owners are not held liable until they have a certain degree of knowledge that their dog is dangerous or vicious. If the owner knows about their dog's harmful behavior after the first incident, they can be held strictly liable for injuries inflicted on others by their dogs.
What happens when a dog bites someone in Texas?
There are a number of causes of action available to the victim of dog attack in Texas. They include negligence, causing a dog bite by violating an animal control law, failing to stop a dog attack which is in progress, and keeping a dog that is known to be vicious.
Is Texas a one-bite rule state?
Yes, Texas follows the “one bite rule”. This rule means that dog owners are charged with awareness of their dog's tendency to bite after the first incident in which the dog either bites someone or acts like it wanted to bite someone. If an owner fails to prevent a subsequent bite, they may be held strictly liable for the injuries inflicted by the dog.
What is the one-bite rule?
Under the one bite rule, the victim of a dog bite can recover from the owner, harborer or keeper of a dog under a strict liability theory if (a) the dog previously had bitten a person or acted like it wanted to, and (b) the owner or possessor of the dog was aware or had reason to know that dog had dangerous propensities abnormal to its class. If either of those conditions are not met, the owner or possessor of the dog will not be strictly liable to the dog bite victim. The “one bite rule” shields a dog owner from liability each time one of the owner’s dogs bites a person for the first time unless it can be shown that the owner knew that the dog had the propensity to bite people without justification. Stated another way, the owner of a dog is not liable for injuries caused by the dog unless the dog is vicious and knowledge or constructive knowledge of that fact is shown on the part of the owner
What type of dog bites/attacks does your firm handle?
We are interested in cases involving unprovoked dog attacks where the facts reveal a colorable argument that the dog owner knew or had a reasonable reason to know of the dog’s propensity for violence.
_edited_jp.jpg)